Three diverse women engaging in teamwork on a laptop indoors.
Photo by Antonius Ferret on Pexels

Knowledge & Wikis

Team knowledge and wiki software

Compare Confluence, Notion and SharePoint for team knowledge, then check findability, ownership, access and review before choosing a wiki.

Choose team knowledge software by testing whether colleagues can find a current answer, see who maintains it and open any material needed to act on it. A searchable page collection still needs a publishing routine. The best fit depends on the audience, the proposed plan and who can maintain the guidance.

Decide what belongs in the knowledge base

Start with questions colleagues repeatedly ask during everyday work, handovers and onboarding. Give each reusable answer a clear title, the action to take, relevant exceptions and an owner. A project draft can stay in a working document; an instruction people will rely on needs a maintained home.

Agree which page is authoritative when an answer appears in several places. When a process changes, update that page and direct readers away from superseded wording. Mark an unresolved answer as unresolved instead of presenting a plausible draft as an approved rule.

Shortlist the approach that fits

Confluence Cloud suits teams willing to organise guidance in spaces and manage page ownership alongside access. A page creator is its owner by default. Ownership can be transferred to someone with space access and edit access to the page. Check space and page permissions together.

On Premium and Enterprise, the content manager can help space admins find pages with deactivated owners and filter by activity or update date. Its Last active filter excludes pages with children, so it cannot supply a complete stale-page list.

Notion suits teams that want a flexible wiki made from pages and views. A wiki includes a Pages I own view. Owners can verify wiki pages for a period or indefinitely, and an owner is notified when verification expires.

Verification is a prompt to maintain the answer, not proof that it is correct. Verification for individual pages outside a wiki has separate Business and Enterprise plan conditions.

SharePoint modern pages suit organisations already maintaining Microsoft 365 sites and document libraries. A team can publish guidance on pages and display supporting documents through web parts.

A site owner can configure a page approval flow for new and updated pages; the flow requires major and minor version history. Check the permissions on both the page and any supporting file. Page approval is an optional workflow, not a default guarantee that the instruction is accurate.

Confirm the exact plan, settings and page type before relying on a feature.

Confluence content-tree ownership has practical limits: ownership cannot be transferred for space overview pages or blogs, or through the mobile app.

The previous owner keeps edit access after a transfer but cannot transfer ownership back unless they are also an admin. Include these exceptions when deciding whether ownership settings will support the team’s intended governance.

In Notion, only pages can be turned into wikis; a database cannot. A wiki’s default Home view can explain what it contains or identify the owning team, while All pages presents the pages as a database view. A verified page displays a blue check mark in mentions and search results, giving readers a visible status cue.

For SharePoint, modern pages are created in the Site Pages library, and a page needs a title to be saved. A private draft is visible only to its author and people it is shared with. These distinctions matter when testing what readers can see before a page is published.

When a SharePoint approval flow is configured, a submitted page shows Pending approval rather than publishing immediately. Approvers receive an email request; an approved page is published, while a rejected page returns to draft status. Check this path with both an author and an approver account before relying on it.

Compare team knowledge software: Confluence, Notion and SharePoint

  • Best forTeams needing structured spaces with ownership and permissions management
  • Ownership transferYes (via space and page permissions; not for blogs or space overview pages)
  • Verification systemNo built-in verification; relies on owner accountability
  • Approval flowOptional workflow using major/minor versions
  • Page creation locationSpace pages or Site Pages library
  • Search visibility cuesNone for current status; rely on owner and update date
  • Supports private draftsYes (visible only to author and shared users)
  • Content manager (Premium/Enterprise)Yes – for archiving, deletion, automation, and bulk updates

Key facts about ownership and access in team knowledge tools

Confluence: Owner transfer possible?
Yes, but not for blogs or space overview pages
Notion: Verified pages show blue check mark?
Yes, in mentions and search results
SharePoint: Approval flow requires version history?
Yes – major and minor versions needed
Confluence: Content manager available on Standard?
No – only on Premium and Enterprise

Check the operating controls

In Confluence, the content manager is available to space admins on Premium and Enterprise, but not Standard; its filters include content type, status, labels, contributors and update date. Its table excludes drafts and databases, so it is not a complete inventory of everything being worked on.

The content manager can archive or delete content, change its owner or status, run automation, and convert pages to live docs.

Because nested pages inherit view permissions from a parent by default, moving a parent or child without setting specific permissions can expose content to an unintended audience. Treat structural changes as access changes, not just tidying.

Check the reader's journey

Give each shortlisted setup the same safe, recurring work question. Ask someone who did not write the answer to search with their usual account. Can they identify the current instruction, open its supporting material and see whom to ask about an exception? Repeat with another role if its access differs.

NeedWhat to check
FindabilityDoes a likely search phrase or navigation route lead to the answer?
TrustIs the instruction approved, current and owned by someone able to resolve questions?
AccessCan intended readers open the page and the files it relies on?
MaintenanceCan an owner find pages needing review and withdraw obsolete guidance?

Record the plan, settings and accounts used. Include a realistic cross-section of high-use material before planning a wider migration; a small sample cannot establish the result at scale.

For a Notion search test, try an exact phrase in quotation marks as well as the wording a colleague would naturally use. Search results can show labels such as Most viewed or Popular this week, but these cues do not establish that an instruction is current; check the page itself and its owner.

Set the publishing rule

Name the owner of each subject area, who may approve a material change and what triggers review. Begin with a few high-use answers, then fix their titles, access and wording when readers have difficulty using them. Move more material once people can distinguish current guidance from drafts and old records.

Set the publishing rule: a four-step process

  1. Name the ownerAssign one person responsible for each subject area
  2. Define approval authorityIdentify who can approve significant changes to guidance
  3. Set review triggersEstablish when updates are required (e.g., after policy change, quarterly)
  4. Pilot with high-use contentStart with key answers that teams frequently reference

In this guide

  1. Comparing a team wiki with a shared document folderDecide whether a team needs maintained wiki answers, a shared document folder or both, using a practical retrieval and update check.
  2. Structuring knowledge around questions employees askTurn recurring employee questions into clear knowledge pages with task-based titles, direct answers, useful exceptions and a retrieval check.
  3. Assigning ownership to an internal knowledge pageDefine what a knowledge-page owner must maintain, separate editing from approval and transfer responsibility when roles change.
  4. Finding outdated knowledge before it causes mistakesUse change signals, owner checks and a clear correction or retirement decision to find outdated internal guidance before colleagues act on it.

More from Knowledge & Wikis

Knowledge & Wikis

Collaborative whiteboards

Learn when a collaborative whiteboard helps, how to organise participation and how to turn the session into a usable outcome.